Greetings,

I wonder who this is possible. How it is possible that different nations can rely on USA paranoia and believe that Iran is researching Strategic Warfare a.k.a nuclear weapons. This is simply not believable. I can not understand how nation just blame other in researching nuclear weapons. It is true that USA and Iran do not have good relations, but come on we are not in the cold war years to use propaganda against the opposite side…

I personally believe Iran, if they say that they are using nuclear energy for peaceful goals, like energetics. Iran is a nation with big electricity needs many families live without it. So because of some kind of paranoia this will continue? But wait there is more. USA put many sanctions on Iran simply because they believe in something or dreaming I can call it… Thanks to this many Iranian families suffer, USA government is paranoiac!? Isn’t this paranoia dangerous? Why the Russians or Chinese are not that paranoiac? Oh wait, because they do not pretend to know everything and do not pretend to be Gods!

Oh may, today I read that new resolution will be drafted in UN-SC about those sanctions. It will be presented by Germany, France and Britain… It seems that EU is under Bush’s hand. It seems that EU is USA puppet. I’m little surprised that they believe on some paranoia and even more – Bush’s paranoia… I thought that EU is under Putin’s hand, but it seems that is under Bush’s one…

I clearly disagree with this move and see it as just another way to blame Mid East…

Hm, this thing clearly does not bother me or my country it is no interest for my country or me if Iran will be sanctioned or not or embargoed. I do not know why I’m writing this… Maybe because of moral… I do not know….

Greetings,

It was interesting to learn that Israel stopped the fuel delivery to Gaza’s electrical plant. This made people to live without electricity. And the lack of electricity will rise up many problems in Gaza’s society. This will make hospitals, polices nonfunctional. It might also rise up protests and new tensions in this region. But why Israel would do such thing?

It is because they accused Gaza’s militants of firing rockets toward Israel. I do not feel that this is a reason to leave people without electricity. It’s not peoples action. It is done by organizations who does not approve Israeli politics in Mid East. Stopping electricity will not force those organizations to surrender it will just create more support for them among the Gaza’s people.

My personal opinion is that this is wrong and not fair. Gaza’s people were involved in war which they do not wanted or participated. They just want peace. They should not suffer because of the acts of some so called freedom fighters. I do not also agree with the politics of Israel but that’s other topic.

What is your opinion on this act done by Israel? Do you think it can be effective?

The debate topic is:

ARE YOU FOR OR AGAINST NUCLEAR WEAPONS?

Additional questions(if your position about the prime question is AGAINST):

1. Should nuclear technology be banned completely(nuclear plants, etc.)
2. What harm can bring the Nuclear Plants?
3. Are nuclear plants safe? Are they harming the nature in their normal work

Additional questions(if your position about the prime question is FOR):

1. Should every nation posses nuclear weapons or only the nations who are victorious from WWII
2. In what occasions nuclear weapons should be used
3. What damage can nuclear weapons bring to the nature and society

Greetings,

In recent years many ecological organizations, governments and scientists are talking about that global warming stuff. It is classified as increment in the global temperatures during recent years.

I’m not going to fill your head with numbers and decreases. So let’s focus on the global warming and it’s nature not on the data. Global warming, what is the first theory about what is causing it? Well here is what the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said “most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations“. Yes this is the most common and believed theory. There are other theories like that the sun had increased it’s power and the global warming is actually caused by this. Other think that it is natural warming after the last Ice Age(not the move). Yes there are many theories, I see, but how much are the possible suggestions for solution? Are the governments interested in resolving that problem? Is there someone who make money from the Global warming? Hm, as we see there are many interesting questions. But, I believe that the most important is what will be the effect of this process of warming? Well, here are the main effects:  Rising sea levels, glacier retreat, Arctic shrinkage, and altered patterns of agriculture are cited as direct consequences, but predictions for secondary and regional effects include extreme weather events, an expansion of tropical diseases, changes in the timing of seasonal patterns in ecosystems, and drastic economic impact. Concerns have led to political activism advocating proposals to mitigate, eliminate, or adapt to it.

If this will calm you down there are some positive effects about global warming: Regions like Western Siberia will melt. This region is very rich of methane and coals. And those are important resources. But I personally believe that the negative effects are much more than the positive.

My personal point about global warming is that this is a big problem but not an important one. I see it as circle process like the circle of the moon it rises and goes down, like the circle of the seasons. Before ages there were a “global cooling” and it leaded to an Ice Age. From it’s end the temperatures are rising. They are rising and today, but I believe that they will stop and then will start falling again. Everything is circle. This is my points.

I’m interested to hear yours. What do you think about global warming? Can you introduce a realistic plan how to stop it?

Greetings,

what do you think about George Cooney new role? Oh you do not know about it? I will explain.

Clooney has been appointed as UN messenger of peace. He will promote peace between the people around the world. George proved that he care about the people. He will try to improve the lives of millions of people. But Clooney is not alone there are 8 more people with the same goal.

Now lets stop and see what should be one Messenger of Peace and who are the rest members.Those are individuals selected from different spheres like music, art, sport and other. Their goal is to bring the world attention to the work of UN. Those persons will lend their free time, passion and efforts to help the UN to improve the lives of people around the world who live in bad conditions. With their speeches, public appearances, contacts with the international media and humanitarian work, they will help normal people to understand better UN and its work and will make people more sensitive on topics like world hunger, death, diseases and other.

Here are the rest members:

• Princess Haya Bint Al Hussein
• Daniel Barenboim
• George Clooney
• Paulo Coelho
• Midori Goto
• Michael Douglas
• Jane Goodall
• Yo-Yo Ma
• Elie Wiesel

Now what do you think? Will this this method of UN increase it’s popularity and support and would you accept to be Messenger of Peace.

Everyone at least one time in his life dreamed to fly. Most of the people nowadays are doing it. Some of them are doing it with their own planes other with airbuses, third with choppers or balloons. It is true that there are many ways to fly, but only one sky. Today the sky is full with planes. One day they will become more than birds, I believe. There are people on the ground  who take care of the planes in the sky, because if those iron birds are not directed from the ground there will be many problems. This is very stressing job, but it is very important. Why people prefer flying? Here are some possible reasons:

1. It is safe;
2. It is fast;

Do you know other reasons?

There are also people who don’t like flying. Some of them are fear other have health problems. Third can not afford it.

Please share your opinion why you like flying or does not like it.  What are the reasons to fly or not to fly? How would you advise people who fear flying?

Thank you.

Greetings, I would like to lay down my feelings about the the visit of the Russian president in Bulgaria. Many Bulgarians criticized the decisions and the treaties that have been made and signed. Why is this? But before answering this let’s first look what was the point of the visit.

The official version is that he came to discuss the new ferryboat line between Varna and Caucasus. This is beneficial for Bulgaria because give it’s chance to become main port of the EU for Black Sea and linking the union with the rest of the Black Sea countries.

Also the president wanted to discuss the huge dis-balance between the trade of Russia and Bulgaria. Russia have much bigger potential than Bulgaria. They import goods for about 4 billions while Bulgaria imports to Russia goods for only 200 millions. This is more than unfair. We are all for globalization, but globalization must be made on the principles of fair and loyal agreements. Not to use methods than they will do nothing more than to rip the economy of a country.In the old good ways you have to use weapons to take over one country, but now you can do it with economical measures. First you will take over it’s market, then when you do this you can make monopole over the goods. After that when the economy is ripped, the country will be forced to borrow money and then the dependence begins, which is followed from nothing else than colonization.It is good to see that the president is coming to discuss this issue. But what was actually about the discussion? About the project “South Steam”… nothing about the trade. This project is something good for Bulgaria it will bring millions in it’s economy, but is it good for EU?

Well EU is trying to reduce it’s dependence from the Russian gas and I personally do not think that this project will help much. After all EU is building new gas way – Nabuku. It is ironic to see that Bulgaria is opening new way for Russian gas expansion while in the same time it is also transit country for Nabuku, the project which will stop the Russian expansion. I do not think that this double games will be tolerated in EU. Russia will go further and further in Bulgarian economy with it’s petrol, gas, and Nuclear investment in the nuclear plant in Belene. It is actually not investment, but a borrow which will make nothing more than to put us under the Putin’s expansion plans. Maybe Bulgaria is just the start point of Putin to put his hand over the EU.

Oh well while this in the same time the unfair trade between Bulgaria and Russia will continue, because Mr. Putin actually doesn’t care about this as long as Russia is on profit, but why the Bulgarian government is not interested on this?